CONFERENCES
Global Home       Home       Contact Us       FAQ
 
OMICS Group
 
The term “Spam” refers to the unholy practice of sending a series of unwanted mass email messages to a large number of people at a time. In a majority of the cases, a spam takes the shape of commercial spam that trespasses into the mails of recipients without any benefit to them. The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 facilitates prosecuting people who are found to be involved in promoting illegal spamming techniques. On its part, the OMICS Group has put in an effective mechanism that accepts a credible mailing list of scientific scholars and prospective research scholars who intend to get their work incorporated into our journals.

OMICS Publishing Group is glad to announce its recent initiative of acquiring journals from reputed publishers. So far journals have been acquired from Aston Journals (USA), Ashdin Publishers (USA), LibPubMedia (UK), La Prensa Medica (Argentina) & Oral Health and Dental Management (Romania), respectively.
To know more: The accusations of spam faced by a scientific organization hamper the overall prospects of research, and the exchange of emails that leads to the dissemination of knowledge sees a dark tunnel. This is because more number of researchers and university professors have an e-mail account, blog, and a large number of these learned scholars would solicit communication from publishers. An email drafted and sent properly would allow the recipient to come across the right options to register for any scientific event and submit papers for the same.

Wary of the word spam, the internet sellers and even promoters of certain services have seen some kind of a bleak picture that could hamper the market of learning and even educational service promotions, and looking out for newer strategies other than the e-mail might not serve the desired purpose at both ends.

The concept of open access publishing has been labelled by certain groups as fake or dubious, and that those are into active spam, while a scientific organization does not have the means for safeguarding itself from recurring complaints. The wiki pages and the content in Wikipedia about open access publishing speak volumes of its benefits. Nevertheless, it is high time for the publishing entities and open access advocates to maintain reputation and utilize their resources to preventing of scam and building more positive review and tackling fake claims. As with any other system in place, the open access movement has witnessed its own bad times with its opponents targeting the industry with the blame of predatory approach.